Leadership in times of crisis: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic
Sonja Lengauer
The COVID-19 crisis challenged organizations around the world in unprecedented ways. For leaders, it was a real-life stress test that required fast decisions, clear communication, and the ability to navigate uncertainty. My master's thesis, “Leadership in Trouble? The Role of Leadership in Production-Based Companies in Austria During the COVID-19 Crisis 2020”, explored how leaders in Austrian manufacturing companies managed this extraordinary situation and what leadership practices proved most effective.
Leadership has always been a multifaceted field, shaped by a wide range of theories and approaches, from transformational leadership to the path-goal theory. Crisis leadership, however, represents a distinct area that comes into focus when organizations face severe disruption, uncertainty, and rapid change. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted exactly these conditions. Leaders had to operate in an environment characterized by volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity, diversity, and dynamic change, also known as VUCADD.
The study was based on qualitative interviews with nine CEOs of Austrian production-based companies. The goal was to understand their experiences, challenges, and leadership practices during the first phase of the pandemic.
The findings reveal several key insights. First, leadership in times of crisis requires taking responsibility and making decisions, even when information is incomplete. Waiting for certainty was rarely an option. Second, communication emerged as one of the most critical leadership tools. Leaders emphasized the importance of immediate, frequent, authentic, and transparent communication, whether through face-to-face conversations, written updates, or digital channels.
Digitalization also played a vital role. Companies increasingly relied on digital tools, platforms, and apps to maintain communication, collaboration, and operational continuity. While production activities often required physical presence, many organizations successfully adapted their processes and introduced new ways of working.
Another important finding was the strong focus on employee safety. To ensure business continuity while protecting their workforce, companies implemented extensive health and safety measures. Production workflows were redesigned, distancing measures introduced, and workplace routines adjusted to minimize infection risks.
Interestingly, most leaders did not consciously apply specific leadership theories during the crisis. Instead, they relied on experience, intuition, and personal responsibility. Many described their role as being a “rock in the sea” – a stable and reliable presence that provides orientation, confidence, and calm during turbulent times.
The study demonstrates that effective leadership during a crisis is less about following a particular leadership model and more about combining decisiveness, adaptability, empathy, and communication. In a world that continues to face disruption and uncertainty, these lessons remain highly relevant for leaders across all industries.
Key takeaway: In times of crisis, employees do not necessarily need a leader with all the answers. They need a leader who provides clarity, communicates openly, takes responsibility, and creates stability when everything else feels uncertain.